There is a common trend in literature involving heroes; conflicts, resolutions, struggles, triumphs. A hero really isn't a hero unless they've done something heroic. Story tellers have been coming up with different ways of putting characters through trials and issues since the beginning, many having wildly different approaches. One of the most classic examples of a hero's story comes from Beowulf, aka the oldest piece of surviving Old English literature found to date. His astounding deeds and total badassery make for a great hero story; he kills the bad guys, becomes king, gets loot, and dies after killing off a dragon at the very end. Great stuff, all be it a little rudimentary. However, certain key elements to his story point to connections to another hero's tale; the Saga of Grettir the Strong.

Overall, the key difference of the two is by far the approach to the "hero's journey," Grettir the Strong's leaving the reader with the point of "hero" much more debatable than the flatly stated "lived a hero, died a hero," type found in Beowulf. Getting into certain key elements of the story, some very large similarities do begin to arise however, and that has led many to believe that the two may have bridged from one another.


The events stemming from this monster slaying also lead to complete polar opposites, a brief and partial connection technically being able to be made immediately afterwards. Grendel's mother comes and seeks revenge for her dead son and leading to more conflict, and Glam puts a curse on Grettir that makes him afraid of the dark, being alone, and also less heroic and strong from that day forth. While Grendel's mother is an issue, Beowulf takes her down too, pushing him to be the king of the Geats, while Grettir's story begins to turn downhill as everything starts to go wrong for him.
In conclusion, I'd say it's neat that these two heroes wrestled evil monsters in the middle of the night and killed them, but the similarities end there. Both are great stories none the less, and reading Grettir the Strong has certainly made me more appreciative of ancient literature, as I've started even looking into other old stories to read after.
I agree that Grettir's saga subverts the traditional definition of a hero. Grettir is proven to be more of an "antihero", actually. He is shown to have little to no admirable traits, yet he is the protagonist of the saga. I think that this indicates to the reader that a what constitutes a "hero" is much broader than what was initially thought. It seems like a "hero" is just an extremely competent individual who slays beasts and has a superhuman level of strength. Their actual personality, and the content of their character, however, is not guaranteed to be honorable and just. Beowulf never skins horses alive.
ReplyDelete