Showing posts with label Njal's Saga. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Njal's Saga. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Syncretism of Christianity and Old Norse Paganism in Njal's Saga


Hey! It’s your friendly neighborhood anthropology major Nicole, back once more to talk about Viking culture. In this blog post, I’ll be discussing the syncretism of Christianity and pagan religion as it happened in Iceland around the year 1000. To do this, I’ll be looking at how this event was described in Njal’s saga—a saga that is known for mirroring some historical truths. What influenced the abrupt conversion to Christianity? How did it impact Viking culture? These are a couple of the questions I’ll be attempting to answer.

Image result for syncretism
First, I think it’s necessary to define syncretism here. Syncretism is, essentially, a combination of religions, cultures, or modes of thinking. In this context, we’ll be discussing the amalgamation of the brand-new religion, Christianity, with the pre-existing pagan religion following the Old Norse gods. While it’s true that a conversion to Christianity took place in Iceland and the culture shifted rapidly, this doesn’t mean that the ways of thinking and existing that were tied to paganism completely died out. Instead, what Iceland was left with was this strange combination of the two lifestyles that, in the end, didn’t lead to a radically different culture for a long time.

What pushed people to convert to Christianity? Law was a major factor, it seems like. At the Thing in Njal’s saga, Thorgeir made a point that if everyone was split on their laws and religion, then peace would also be split, and nobody could live with that. He announced this once they had reached a decision:

‘This will be the foundation of our law,’ he said, ‘that all men in this land are to be Christians and believe in one God – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – and give up all worship of false idols, the exposure of children, and the eating of horse meat. Three years’ outlawry will be the penalty for open violations, but if these things are practiced in secret there shall be no punishment.’

It became the law for people to follow Christianity, and to only perform pagan practices in private spaces. It’s said here that later, pagan practices were prohibited in private settings, as well. But, this brings up a good point. Despite their conversion to Christianity, people still followed their old ways of living that were tied to their honor culture. They participated in pagan traditions, as well as violent acts—they would fight and kill each other over blood feuds, just as they had before the conversion. Christianity didn’t immediately make them any more mild or peaceful. Njal’s saga gives many good examples of this—one being when Hildigunn throws Hoskuld’s bloody cloak over Flosi’s shoulders and invokes God when she persuades him to avenge his fallen friend:

Then she spoke: ‘This cloak, Flosi, was your gift to Hoskuld, and now I give it back to you. He was slain in it. In the name of God and all good men I charge you, by all the powers of your Christ and by your courage and manliness, to avenge all the wounds which he received in dying – or else be an object of contempt to all men.’

She is reifying Viking honor culture and violence as she says this. Christianity didn’t have a large effect on how she thought he should handle this situation. If anything, the religion gave her the language she needed to convince him that avenging Hoskuld was something worth doing. While they are undoubtedly Christians, they also have their pagan identity that cannot be simply erased or replaced by a new religion or lifestyle.

Image result for christianity

There’s much more to be said on this topic, and many more examples to give—my account of syncretism between paganism and Christianity is simplified here, but I hope the point at least got across. Though Iceland did rapidly convert to Christianity, there wasn’t this copy and paste of Christian morals, ethics, and lifestyle. They remained true to their honor culture and pagan practices while also taking the path to follow a new religion.

Saturday, October 6, 2018

Is Njal a God-like Figure?

In Njal’s Saga, Njal is representative of some kind of higher power that is consulted but not always followed, creating this air of religious construct away from that of Christianity. From the very beginning, he is a person very different from that of the normal Icelandic man. He is seen as a man of power and great wisdom, far more than any other man seen in previous sagas. He was always odd considering that “no beard grew on him” (pg. 35). Men of Iceland were always known for being very large physically as well as hairy. Njal is envisioned as someone who is genuinely different and could represent a sort of god-like religious figure within the democratic structure.


            Despite the growing presence of Christianity in Iceland, there was still a continuous need for a wise being within the realm of the law. He consulted constantly throughout the saga, especially in cases that involve consequences and advice. When Bergthora and Hallgerd were doing their best to get people killed all because of a seat on a bench, Njal provided several pieces of advice, noting it probably wasn’t a good idea and he didn’t want to get involved. And when kinsmen of those who had been taken victim demanded that a settlement be created, Njal was always involved. Even with all of this wisdom and prestige, his friends and his family still wouldn’t listen to him. This mirrors that of what occurs in Christianity, the bible and other instances, where humans betray the given advice of God, despite the possibility of the outcome.



            He also has a magical ability to “see” the future, making his wisdom far more superior. He is able to predict the death of Gunnar and also of himself, claiming they were incredibly unexpected. He is able to see into the past and into the future, settle scores and bring peace. This ability makes him stand out from other men. The breadth of knowledge that Njal has is used by several men and women throughout the saga. They constantly ask him for help and consult on matters, but when it comes to providing advice that they don’t necessarily agree with, they don’t always take it, which is similar to that of Christianity or other religions. When faced with the odds of what is right versus what is wanted, people tend to abandon correct advice.
            Njal is a very complex person, with insane abilities that no other person has. He is so well read in laws that no one can match his settlements and rulings. He is able to see into the future and predict what’s going to happen. He can see into the past with vast memories. Even with the ability and unrelenting stream of advice for those who ask for it, people still disobey him and end up suffering the consequences. This is shown several times when people refer to their Gods in any sort of religion. Despite a clear image of what is seen to be right, they disobey. Njal acts as a democratic god-like figure for those in Iceland, with powers beyond those that are human. 

Wednesday, October 3, 2018

HBO’s Game of Thrones Mirroring Njal’s Saga


HBO took George R.R. Martin’s famous book series, Game of Thrones and made a television series. The show and book series have a ‘Dungeons and Dragons’ theme to the storyline and consists of various characters that can be compared to numerous ones in Njal’s Saga. Both consist of feuds that turn bloody, powerful women murderers, and honorable men that have their honor get them destroyed. It is interesting to see how the two follow similar paths in plot. Certain characters featured in Game of Thrones are the Starks (Ned Stark and Arya Stark), the Lannisters (Cersei Lannister), Daenerys, and Littlefinger. These mentioned characters unintentionally reflect the Njalssons, the Sigfussons, Hoskuld Thrainsson, the burning at Bergthoshvol, Hallgerd, and Bergthora. While some of these merely compare to conflicts and events, some characters follow a similar archetype to that of the other. These similarities are important to hold into consideration because they can provide a deeper understanding of the text and pop culture.  
The Starks and The Lannisters

The Starks are a prominent family within Game of Thrones. Throughout the series, the Starks act as the protagonists within the story. They have a hostile feud with the Lannisters that last throughout all seasons and books, much like the Njalssons and Sigfussons do in Njal’s Saga. The Lannisters are also a prestigious family within the series, and primarily act as antagonists. This strife between the two lead to great bloodshed and numerous conflicts.
Ned Stark
Ned Stark is a main character in the first book and season in GOT and his most noticeable character trait is his honor. He is known for being an honorable man, and always trying to do the right thing. No reader or viewer can deny that he is innocent of any bloodshed or any feud, and this innocence, this honor of his, is what led him to his unfortunate and undeserving death. This can be compared to the murder of Hoskuld Thrainsson, whom is also innocent and undeserving.
Arya Stark
Arya Stark is one of Ned Stark’s daughters who begins the show as a defenseless girl who refuses to be a damsel and later turns herself into a weapon of destruction. Her ruthlessness and gift of grudge-holding reminds us of Bergthora. Berthora arranges six killings in revenge while Arya kills for revenge as well. 

Littlefinger
Littlefinger is a character as well in GOT. His clever mind sets feuds and murder into motion through his persuading words and gossip. Mord Valgardsson spreads enough gossip to get Hoskuld Thrainsson killed just as Littlefinger gets Ned Stark executed.
Cersei Lannister

Cersei Lannister is introduced to readers and viewers as Queen of the Seven Kingdoms (the setting in GOT). Her first husband, King Robert Baratheon, was physically abusive to her. While Cersei is not a moral woman to begin with, she was still a victim of domestic abuse. Because of this, and many other plotlines, she murders her husband. This makes us recall Hallgerd and her reasoning for not giving her husband a hair for his bow, eventually leading to extreme bloodshed, all because he hit her. 

Daenerys
Daenerys is another powerful female figure in GOT. She acts as a born leader, survivor, and fighter. She is made to be a protagonist; however, in recent episodes she burns two innocent men alive, despite her advisor’s heeding. She does so irrationally and to demonstrate her power. This relates to the burning at Bergthorshvol because both were unjustifiable actions/events.

Monday, September 24, 2018

The Loose Structure of Democracy in the Viking Age

Throughout the sagas roaming through Viking times, there has been mention of a certain annual event called the Althing. This is some sort of country wide happening where matters and problems are discussed, but it is usually briefly brought up and then disregarded. Grettir attends the Althing several times before he becomes an outlaw. Hrut and Hoskuld went to the Althing where Unn, Hrut’s wife, admitted to her “horrible” lifestyle with Hrut. This event was obviously very important, and unlike anything seen in different government structures throughout history. This type of system mirrors that which we have in the United States, which was rooted in equality and justice.
The Althing was a yearly event that essentially represented a government concerning all matters of Iceland. This affair could cover a number of topics, from reading over the current laws of the communities to creating new laws to addressing specific problems that occurred throughout the year. Free men from all over the country would gather there and voice their concerns and issues, where a council of specialized men would vote and decide on what kind of consequence that problem entailed. In certain instances, the penalty would be very violent while other times it would be a specific payment for the wrong doing. A large span of issues could be brought up at the Althing from acts of treachery to blood feuds. This judicial system mimics that of modern democracy in America.



Though the court system runs constantly throughout the year, it is still a very similar set up to that of the Viking age. Today, there is a set jury and judge to decide punishments for breaking the law and interrupting social balances. They are held much more often than once a year and in a variety of different places, but the basic premise is still the same. This is important because it shows a certain equalizing personality of the country, Iceland, as a whole. Most European countries near Iceland had monarchs going back hundreds of years, or a single family ruling over an area of land, but that influence did not infiltrate the people of Iceland. Those of the Viking age did not believe in a specific person being the ruler of their whole country, rather getting an opinion from several different and wise-minded individuals to encourage justice and fairness within the land.



This behavior most likely stems from the traditional nature of Iceland, where the culture around handling situations was very set in stone. They were very concerned with family and doing the correct societally normative actions. So if there was a problem that arose, not only was it noted and remembered by those involved, but it was brought up at the Althing, where a consequence would be dolled out. This system mirrors that which is America today, where wrongdoers are judged by several individuals, not just one man or one woman. The people of Iceland believe very firmly in the exposure to several opinions when determining someone’s fate, which stems from a culture buried in tradition. This attitude towards equality stands out due to the monarchial history around Europe, and made the Viking culture very distinct.